Five platforms, read from their own vendor documentation, not from the industry's usual secondhand summaries. Each explainer states what the platform's own screening tools do, in the platform's own named terms, with a verified-as-of date and its sources listed in the open. What a specific employer configured inside that platform is never visible to anyone, including us; every page says so plainly.
Greenhouse's Talent Matching feature, on its Plus and Pro plans, compares an applicant's resume against a weighted calibration: a rubric the hiring team defines before scoring starts. A separate scorecard-attributes feature and an AI Keyword Suggestions tool add further filtering, built from the job title and description. What Greenhouse's tools do is documented; what any one employer configured inside them is not visible to anyone, including us.
LeverScores resumesLever’s AI-generated scorecards evaluate candidates across four named dimensions: Technical, Leadership, Culture Fit, and Communication, each paired with an explicit advancement recommendation. Candidates move through visible pipeline stages (Sourced, Applied, Screen, Interview, Offer), with dashboards flagging where someone is "sitting too long." Lever’s own product page describes no automatic resume scoring or auto-rejection; the scorecards and stages are evaluator tools, not a silent filter.
AshbyScores resumesAshby's AI-assisted application review scores a candidate against criteria the recruiter defines, returning, for each criterion, one of three statuses: meets, does not meet, or undecided, in Ashby's own words, alongside an overall criteria-met percentage. Ashby documents no way for that AI review to reject anyone by itself. The one automated reject it documents keys off application-form answers, like location, not the resume.
WorkableScores resumesWorkable’s paid Workable Agent add-on evaluates a candidate against up to 14 job-specific criteria (named examples include authorization, salary, hybrid days, and certifications), each scored independently and normalized to a 0-100 scale, per Workable’s own product page. Workable states obvious disqualifications are filtered automatically, and that the recruiter, not Workable, configures the screening thresholds and scoring weights.
BambooHRNo native scoringBambooHR's own applicant tracking system product page makes no claim of AI resume scoring, keyword matching, or scorecard ranking, none. It describes job-board posting, candidate management, automated communications, e-signature offers, self-scheduled interviews, and background checks. A separate ecosystem of third-party add-ons sells AI screening bolted onto BambooHR, but that is not BambooHR's own feature or claim.
| Platform | Native scoring tool | Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse | Yes, see the explainer for the named mechanism | 2026-07-24 |
| Lever | Yes, see the explainer for the named mechanism | 2026-07-23 |
| Ashby | Yes, see the explainer for the named mechanism | 2026-07-24 |
| Workable | Yes, see the explainer for the named mechanism | 2026-07-23 |
| BambooHR | None, native | 2026-07-23 |
Finding jobs and scoring your fit are free. Bring your resume, and we tune it to the job using only what is already true about you.